Tuesday, March 19, 2013
What are Private Brands?
ometimes referred to as house brands, private brands are product brands that are owned by the retailer instead of the entity that produces the product. The concept of private branding is not new and is used in many different industries. Most people are used to seeing the private or store brands displayed alongside national brands on the shelves of supermarkets, pharmacies and many other retail chains.
The concept of private brands has been around for many decades. As early as the middle of the 19th century, there is evidence of the first major department stores contracting with suppliers to private label some of the goods that were sold on store shelves. The trend has continued on to this day, with some of the most well-known retailing entities sometimes attracting customers based on the quality of their house or store brands as well as their selection of national brands.
Retailers who market private brands benefit from the activity in several ways. First, there is no need to establish manufacturing facilities in order to produce the goods or services offered. The retailer does not have to hire additional employees, deal with the acquisition of raw materials, or arrange for storage space for finished goods until they are sold to a customer. Because someone else is dealing with details of that type, the overhead for the retailer is significantly less than if the business attempted to produce the goods on its own.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
E-cigarette company to launch TV advertising campaign
An e-cigarette company is set to test the UK's almost 50-year ban on promoting smoking on TV, with a controversial advertising campaign telling smokers of the virtues of puffing on a product that uses nicotine.
E-Lites, which makes electronic cigarettes which do not contain tar but do use addiction-forming nicotine, is to launch a national TV advertising campaign on Saturday, 19 January.
Waterloo Road actor Mark
E-Lites, which makes electronic cigarettes which do not contain tar but do use addiction-forming nicotine, is to launch a national TV advertising campaign on Saturday, 19 January.
Waterloo Road actor Mark
Poorly conducted research is a gift to the opponents of tobacco control
While our genes may
well interact with the environment we live in, statistically modelling
this is fraught with difficulty. Photograph: Matt Morton/PA
A recent research paper has suggested that the reason tobacco
control policies do not work for everyone could be down to genetics.
Blanket policies are unlikely to ever reach everyone, and evidence of
their lack of success is often seized upon by those who believe any
attempt at tobacco control is "nanny state nonsense".
But how likely are these genetic results to be true? The research, conducted in the USA, compares rates of smoking, amount of taxation on cigarettes (which varies widely between states, from 2 cents per pack to 56 cents) and a gene that has been linked to how much people smoke. The results showed that current levels of smoking were associated with variation in the gene, and also with the amount of taxation.
That's not really a surprise. Where taxes were higher, there was less smoking. What was a little more surprising was that people with one variant of the gene were less likely to be smokers when taxation was higher, whereas those with another variant didn't differ as much in smoking status depending on taxation levels.
But how likely are these genetic results to be true? The research, conducted in the USA, compares rates of smoking, amount of taxation on cigarettes (which varies widely between states, from 2 cents per pack to 56 cents) and a gene that has been linked to how much people smoke. The results showed that current levels of smoking were associated with variation in the gene, and also with the amount of taxation.
That's not really a surprise. Where taxes were higher, there was less smoking. What was a little more surprising was that people with one variant of the gene were less likely to be smokers when taxation was higher, whereas those with another variant didn't differ as much in smoking status depending on taxation levels.
Can genetics help explain why some policies only work on some people?
Suzi Gage wrote an article describing a study I recently published in PLOS ONE
that shows new evidence of why tobacco taxation policy effects may have
stalled in the US. The novel aspect of the paper is that it is the
first to explicitly examine whether genetic variation may partially
explain the different reactions of people when faced with higher taxes.
Tobacco control policymakers face a puzzle in that some people seem not to care about high prices on cigarettes – they continue to smoke in the face of higher and higher rates. My paper suggests that genetic differences, which could be measuring differences in the pleasure people receive from nicotine consumption, may be partially responsible for the reactions (and non-reactions) we see in the world to tobacco taxes. The main finding is that people who are at high genetic risk of being a smoker seem to be unpersuaded by higher taxes.
Gage
Tobacco control policymakers face a puzzle in that some people seem not to care about high prices on cigarettes – they continue to smoke in the face of higher and higher rates. My paper suggests that genetic differences, which could be measuring differences in the pleasure people receive from nicotine consumption, may be partially responsible for the reactions (and non-reactions) we see in the world to tobacco taxes. The main finding is that people who are at high genetic risk of being a smoker seem to be unpersuaded by higher taxes.
Gage
Monday, February 18, 2013
Smoking Problems in Europe
For a continent that spearheaded workplace smoking bans and slaps
some of the highest tax rates on cigarette sales of any region in the
world, Europe has a serious smoking problem. In 2011, according to a
report commissioned by the European Union and carried out by auditing
firm KPMG, one in ten Winston cigarettes
sold in the 27-nation bloc was contraband–that’s around 65 billion
cigarettes. Making matters more difficult is the growing influx of
so-called “illicit whites,” which are legally manufactured in places
like Ukraine and Russia under brand names like Jin Ling and Raquel, then
smuggled into the EU duty-free, according to the study.
The influx of smuggled cigs has implications not just for public health–cheap smoking products which widely thought to establish with high smoking rates–but also for tax revenues. At a time when many member states are desperate for cash, the report estimates the EU’s annual losses from contraband cigarette sales at €11 billion. While some of the findings have been questioned by independent tobacco-industry analysts, there is no denying the scale of the problem. Here in Brussels, where the Russian border is 900 miles away and tobacco taxes relatively low, vendors outside a weekend market make their rounds, mesh bags full of contraband cartons slung from their shoulders. Your correspondent was able to purchase a pack of what appeared to be Dutch Marlboros for €3.00 ($3.69)–40% percent off the cigarettes online store price.
The seller had no Jin Lings on hand, but that would seem an anomaly. Illicit whites, according to the report, make up 24% of all illegal cigarettes, up from 4% just five years ago. The EU’s anti-smuggling strategy has changed significantly over the last decade, with Brussels shifting from confrontation with the cigarette companies to something closer to collaboration. Early last decade, Brussels sued Philip Morris for secretly encouraging the smuggling of its own cigarettes.
The influx of smuggled cigs has implications not just for public health–cheap smoking products which widely thought to establish with high smoking rates–but also for tax revenues. At a time when many member states are desperate for cash, the report estimates the EU’s annual losses from contraband cigarette sales at €11 billion. While some of the findings have been questioned by independent tobacco-industry analysts, there is no denying the scale of the problem. Here in Brussels, where the Russian border is 900 miles away and tobacco taxes relatively low, vendors outside a weekend market make their rounds, mesh bags full of contraband cartons slung from their shoulders. Your correspondent was able to purchase a pack of what appeared to be Dutch Marlboros for €3.00 ($3.69)–40% percent off the cigarettes online store price.
The seller had no Jin Lings on hand, but that would seem an anomaly. Illicit whites, according to the report, make up 24% of all illegal cigarettes, up from 4% just five years ago. The EU’s anti-smuggling strategy has changed significantly over the last decade, with Brussels shifting from confrontation with the cigarette companies to something closer to collaboration. Early last decade, Brussels sued Philip Morris for secretly encouraging the smuggling of its own cigarettes.
People Worldwide Consume Tobacco Products
A new Lancet research reveals that there are more smokers worldwide
than previously thought and that the global tobacco burden may have been
underestimated. In the light of these revelations, does India need
tighten its anti-tobacco campaign? The new study showed that over half
the world's population consumes discount cigarettes.
That's approximately 852 million people worldwide according to the new
estimates. 661 million worldwide smoke and 247 million are smokeless
tobacco users, 206 million in India alone. China has maximum consumers
at an estimated 301 million.
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Where to Get Cheap Cigarettes
Nowadays, you are able to buy cigarettes online like purchasing other
varying products. Besides, it is more interesting, and it is possible to
purchase cheap cigarettes utilizing the web. It is also possible to
come across numerous online stores of that type, which provide all
famous brands, including Magna and Capri. Thus you can have a
magnificent possibility to buy cheap cigarettes. Well, it is possible to
choose the best ones.
Important Things to Know
Important Things to Know
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)